I begin (pt 5)

Today, I believe I learned a little more on why the Hilton Head Fast Metabolism Diet (or whatever it is called) had great success for many. Watch this lovely video, because, it is good for you; and, you might, then, know what I am talking about. At least, if you know what the diet is.

Taking notes from it, now:

500 calories per day for 21 days.  21 days on, 21 days off.
For 1 meal, 1 cup of vegetable.  No fat. Can be steamed
3.5 oz of animal product (grass fed, organic, dry spice if desired)  lean
1 piece of fruit.   2 x per day.   Drink a tremendous amount of water. Can have tea or coffee for breakfast.

Body uses proteins,fats, carbs to produce everything.  If you don't take in protein it will break down muscles, if you don't take in carbs it will break down whatever it can to get the carbs. if you don't take in fats, it will go after the abnormal fats.

2 days before treatment FAT LOAD  Healthy fats  coconuts avocados  nuts seeds  So blood is super rich in fats. Then cut it off completely.

This is all to change your brain

Enzyme supplementing:
West African Mango supplements
Pomegranate
Ginger
Garcinia Cambodia
Apple Cider Vinegar
 Cayenne Pepper

BIO THIN (Mercola)
On the 3 weeks off, you can't take in sugars or breads

Then THIS video

3 kinds of fat   structural, reserve, abnormal

Abnormal = not available to the body in nutritional emergency 
Obese patient will lose reserves, structural fat and only after that abnormal reserves. By then, they are usually tired, famished, and they get wrinkled and old looking.

Obese patients feel reasonably well as long as they are stationary or gaining weight.


All this reminds me of things Dr. Berg said about using high amounts of fat at the beginning of a ketogenic diet, but, not to continue using it in high quantities. It's for the same reason, to get your body to burn your fast. And, when I was doing fasting or intermittent fasting, I was losing on my abdomen, which would be considered the bank of abnormal fat. Well, one of them and the main one.

This is me wheedling things down to the simple.

Now that I am more educated, considering varying sources, I feel I can truthfully say that I'd be comfortable with a mostly raw vegan, fruit first diet that is mostly fat free. But, with some fats, at some points.

I'm not going to go into a big list of what I've been having. Instead, I'll tell you that I found out there is a noxious chemical in the tap water around here and they don't know how long that's been true (so they say), but, as I have been wretchedly ill all summer and fall, I will assume it happened in the early to mid-Spring.

Anyway, I am still doing the noon-8 p.m. limit on when to eat. This is three days of it, including Saturday, which was the day I weighed in the morning.  I've been eating fruit and veggies, some, but, have not been dieting.

I didn't drink coffee Saturday, then not until Sunday evening, and, I drank one cup (much almond and coconut milk) around noon today.

I think I am ready to go back to the book.

Have a lovely day!

Notes on eating more veggies/starches (starting Saturday, Sept, 15)

Sat  9-15-18:   I have run into things by Dr. McDougall (sp?), both pros and cons, a significant portion of my life.  Up until recently, I never heard anything said about him and his ways that made me want to give them a try, because, the having so many starches per day plus a salad didn't used to be feasible most of the year, and, then, when I was older and able to do so, grains seemed to be making me ill.

I showed you a video, a couple of blog posts back, showing the basic idea on how to eat the way he is talking about while losing weight. It does not involved much grains or beans. But, also, in thinking about it, I started to wonder if 1) when I eat beans and get a rash, if it isn't simply because I need to do the low fodmap diet and/or allergy rotation diet, for a while, and, then things would calm down; or, 2) if the rash I get when I eat beans or eat more carbs might not, in point of fact, be a symptom of intense detoxification.

I'm not ready to take a chance that #2 is the correct one, because, if the detox symptoms are that strong, I want to slow that process down, anyway. But, I am quite willing to get back into eating a lot more veggies and little to no meat,  with some grains and little to no oil, no dairy, mostly minimally processed foods or not processed foods, and, then work my way into either a super long fast or the low fodmap diet (or a combination of both), which would culminate in a refeeding/retesting, that leads into a basic rotation diet.

In that light, today, I got various good veggies (broccoli crown, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, baby kale, zucchini), some fruit (strawberries, mandarin oranges, Gala apples), and some grains (pearl barley, millet, quinoa, buckwheat groats).  Not everything I got, outside of these things, was a perfect fit for the McDougall idea,  nor is everything I already have  But, it's a start and it will be better than what I have been doing this last month.

For lunch, maybe dinner, we had Lime Chili Ramen with roasted cauliflower, green pepper and chicken thigh lightly basted in Asian Barbecue Sauce (that's what the bottle says).  It was pretty good and definitely filling.  Pretty sure it was light on the calories and we both agreed (me and my son) that the chicken could have been left out, maybe replaced with  mushrooms.  It was easy to make, tasty and I feel better about life for having  eaten it.

Oh, there were also some baby kale, parsley and collard greens in there, because, I chopped up salad stuff  earlier, which was mostly those things, and, then I threw some into the bowls before I poured the hot water in.

So, today is the first day of my trying to follow McDougall's advice, though I will not be eating beans any time soon. Well, maybe the garbanzo beans I bought a can of, but, not the rest. And, also, of course, I am going to be following his advice, otherwise, to the extent that I believe it will benefit me and veering off sharply in whatever direction I need to, to get my body under control. But, outside of the beans and the amount of the starches suggested (in general) his advice sounds alright. And, maybe the beans and the amount of starches I can handle will change later.

Have a lovely day!


https://www.drmcdougall.com/

Allergies and Good Advice (pt 1)

When I say good advice, I do not mean that I am offering medical advice to you. I am no sort of health professional or in need of  being sued, so I leave that to the experts.

The good advice is from a book I am exploring which was written by a doctor who specialized in the treatment of allergies. The book is called  Dr. Mandell's Allergy-Free COOKBOOK. Some of it's advice I cannot  actually follow, as it is stated, due to already knowing I am allergic to some things included in the eating plans. Fortunately, other bits of advice and common sense cover this.

Now, first of all, let me state that I am not going to purposely advocate any particular style of eating for anyone - such as raw vegan, Paleo, Keto, grain free, wheat free, The Zone, South Beach- because,  I  know two things.One is that we are ant all the same. We have access to different qualities of foods, different burdens, different physical needs. So, it is patently ridiculous to think there is only one way to eat.

Also, I believe in the Bible and ,yes, I know that I should, because, I tried it and it worked out well, and, because, I have seen proof from scholars,medical professionals of varying sorts and laymen that it has worked for them, as well. And, a lot of those diets are firmly against the Bible.

Oh, they are not against the Bible as something to do to improve one's health by utilizing their eating strategies for a while. It's not a sin to use the good advice from them. 

Where they go against the Bible is, again, in  making unclean the things that God has made  clean.

Acts 10 10 But he became very hungry and wanted to eat. While they were preparing the meal, he fell into a trance 11 and saw heaven opened and something descending like a great linen sheet being let down by its four corners on the earth; 12 and in it were all sorts of four-footed animals and reptiles of the earth and birds of heaven. 13 Then a voice said to him: “Get up, Peter, slaughter and eat!” 14 But Peter said: “Not at all, Lord, because I have never eaten anything defiled and unclean.” 15 And the voice spoke again to him, the second time: “Stop calling defiled the things God has cleansed.” 16 This happened a third time, and immediately it was taken up into heaven.

Only, in the case of the diets, they are making unclean even things that Jehovah God had never set aside as unclean and uneatable for even a small time.  Some diets say never to eat fruit or never to eat grains Others say never to eat animals, fish or grains. What does the Bible say?

 Genesis 2: 9 Thus Jehovah God made to grow out of the ground every tree that was pleasing to look at and good for food and also the tree of life in the middle of the garden and the tree of the knowledge of good and bad.


Genesis 2: 15 Jehovah God took the man and settled him in the garden of Eʹden to cultivate it and to take care of it. 16 Jehovah God also gave this command to the man: “From every tree of the garden you may eat to satisfaction.


Genesis 1: 29 Then God said: “Here I have given to you every seed-bearing plant that is on the entire earth and every tree with seed-bearing fruit. Let them serve as food for you. 30 And to every wild animal of the earth and to every flying creature of the heavens and to everything moving on the earth in which there is life, I have given all green vegetation for food.” And it was so.

So, in the beginning, mankind was meant to eat seed-bearing fruit from trees and seed-bearing plants. Which is, what? Sounds like grains and pseudo-grains, berries, nuts and such as that, to me. At this point, flesh was not eaten. But, then the Flood came and at the end of Noah's journey in the ark, came also this:

Genesis 9: 3 Every moving animal that is alive may serve as food for you. Just as I gave you the green vegetation, I give them all to you. 4 Only flesh with its life —its blood —you must not eat

Deuteronomy 6: 3 Hear therefore, O Israel, and observe to do it; that it may be well with thee, and that ye may increase mightily, as Jehovah, the God of thy fathers, hath promised unto thee, in a land flowing with milk and honey

2 Kings 7:1 E·liʹsha now said, “Listen to the word of Jehovah. This is what Jehovah says: ‘Tomorrow about this time at the gate of Sa·marʹi·a, a seah measure of fine flour will be worth a shekel, and two seah measures of barley will be worth a shekel.’”

1^st Samuel 25:18 So Abʹi·gail quickly took 200 loaves of bread, two large jars of wine, five dressed sheep, five seah measures of roasted grain, 100 cakes of raisins, and 200 cakes of pressed figs and put all of it on the donkeys.

Mark 6:41 Taking now the five loaves and the two fish, he looked up to heaven and said a blessing. Then he broke the loaves up and began giving them to the disciples to place them before the people, and he divided up the two fish for all. 42 So they all ate and were satisfied,

Matthew 26: 26 As they continued eating, Jesus took a loaf, and after saying a blessing, he broke it, and giving it to the disciples, he said: “Take, eat. This means my body.” 27 And taking a cup, he offered thanks and gave it to them, saying: “Drink out of it, all of you, 28 for this means my ‘blood of the covenant,’ which is to be poured out in behalf of many for forgiveness of sins. 29 But I say to you: I will by no means drink again any of this product of the vine until that day when I drink it new with you in the Kingdom of my Father.”

What does all this mean? People ate fruit, vegetables, meat, dates, figs, and honey. Even under the Mosaic Law, which restricted scavenger meats, there was still flesh foods of all sorts, including milk from animals. Jesus Christ offered, from his own hand, cooked food, in the form of bread, which is grains. He also offered the flesh of fish. He partook of lamb, bitter greens, bread and wine at the same meal. He encouraged others to eat bread, lamb, bitter greens, fish and wine. Therefore, none of this is wrong, in and of itself. And, no one should teach that it is wrong for all of mankind to partake of any of these in a reasonable, non-gluttonous, non-cruel manner.

So, it is not wrong to be a vegan or a vegetarian, for the sake of promoting a lack of cruelty toward both animals and humans. But, it is wrong to say “meat is murder” under all circumstances, as if animals are not something mankind was allowed to partake of the flesh of, as needed, by the one true God.

It is not wrong to say that you find eating raw vegetables to eating cooked foods, especially meat. But, it is wrong to censure the Son of Man for eating lamb and bread.

To my way of thinking, unless you have reason to believe you have an allergy (intolerances count), or, simply desire not to eat certain foods for your own reasons, this eschewing categories of foods is simply a distraction from the true cause(s) of one's illness, stress and/or weight gain.

Now, does that mean I think it is wrong to try to eat ketogenically for an extended period of time, if it works for you? No. I don't think it is wrong. I think it is unnecessary. And, to simplify one's life is to cut out the unnecessary, as much as possible, unless it is at least so enjoyable that it is not a burden.

IE: It is necessary to wear clothes to adhere to the laws of most places. Wearing colors that flatter your coloring in styles that make your figure look good is not necessary, but, it helps you get along in the world and makes you happier, so, it's good to do.

So, these are the reasons I reject the concepts behind most eating strategies, but, why I don't necessarily reject the actual strategies. 

I realize I haven't actually gotten into the book, yet. But, reasons should be explored and if people cannot give you good reasons for what they do (or, want you to do) they probably shouldn't be in your life.

The end, for now.