1 Thessalonians 4: 13-17

 13 Moreover, brothers, we do not want you to be ignorant about those who are sleeping in death,so that you may not sorrow as the rest do who have no hope. 14 For if we have faith that Jesus died and rose again, so too God will bring with him those who have fallen asleep in death through Jesus.15 For this is what we tell you by Jehovah’s word, that we the living who survive to the presence of the Lord will in no way precede those who have fallen asleep in death; 16 because the Lord himself will descend from heaven with a commanding call, with an archangel’s voice and with God’s trumpet, and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first. 17 Afterward we the living who are surviving will, together with them, be caught away in clouds to meet the Lord in the air; and thus we will always be with the Lord.

Who will descend?  ".. the Lord himself ..."
How will he descend? "...with a commanding call, with an archangel's voice.."
From where will he descend? ".. from heaven..."
Who is he?  "... the Christ ... the Lord ..." 

The Christ is the archangel.  

Jude 9But when Miʹcha·el the archangel had a difference with the Devil and was disputing about Moses’ body, he did not dare to bring a judgment against him in abusive terms, but said: “May Jehovah rebuke you.”

Whom else is the archangel?  "... Michael ..." 
Whom did Michael call on?  ".. Jehovah .." 

Daniel 12: 1 “During that time Miʹcha·el will stand up, the great prince who is standing in behalf of your people.And there will occur a time of distress such as has not occurred since there came to be a nation until that time. And during that time your people will escape,everyone who is found written down in the book.

Who is Michael?  " .. the great prince who is standing in behalf of your people...." 

Revelation 12: 7 And war broke out in heaven: Miʹcha·el and his angels battled with the dragon, and the dragon and its angels battled 8 but they did not prevail, nor was a place found for them any longer in heaven.  

Who battled the dragon? "..Michael and his angels..." 

Revelation 12: 10 I heard a loud voice in heaven say: “Now have come to pass the salvation and the power and the Kingdom of our God and the authority of his Christ, because the accuser of our brothers has been hurled down, who accuses them day and night before our God!

Who does the Kingdom belong to?  "... our God .." 
Who does the Christ belong to?  "... our God..."  ".. his Christ.." 
What does Christ have? " .. the authority.." 
Who was conquered?  "... the accuser of our brothers.. "

Revelation 12:11 And they conquered him because of the blood of the Lamb and because of the word of their witnessing, and they did not love their souls even in the face of death.  

Why was the accuser conquered? "...because of the blood of the Lamb ... " 

Jesus is the archangel. Michael is the archangel. There is only one archangel. They are the same person. Michael disputed with the Devil over Moses body. Therefore, Michael existed before Jesus was born. He had a prehuman existence and has a posthuman existence.

Jesus is not God. The Christ belongs to God and is given authority by God. He is the great prince, the archangel, the Lamb. 

Beach, Baby (digital paintings of beach scenes)

 One of t these is signed and displayed on Facebook. The rest are steps along the way to it or versions I also enjoyed enough to reconsider and work on later, maybe. 

Bauhaus Flower

 I heard some stuff about INTP that made me think I was looking at INFJ too closely. Whatever! 
 Saw a thing that said INTP would be into Bauhaus style . I feel that is essentially true of me. Now.
Had to look into BauHaus. Many things- no. Many things, yes. The meaning (form follows function)Yes.
But,  not just. 

This morning I drew a picture on canvas, with the diea of painting it later, which is much like what I used to draw and which (both) reminds me of some Bauhaus designs. Then, I played with it on Luna Pic. 

This is the varied results of all that. 

This is the original photo.

Screenshots I have made

 

The three above were to just show something about what kind of person I am. I am researching two or three topics. Not "at the same time", but, in bursts of one in between the other, more, I would say. Three opened videos,  Just like they were books of my childhood.  Life is good when there is much to learn.

    My book (R) which is still being sold on Amazon.com by Lulu.com despite that it is highly illegal of them to do so. I just don't have the money to sue them and probably still wouldn't, even if they were paying me royalties on it. The other major point of interest is that when I looked up my book, I ended up finding a picture of my friend, a bearded English writer, in the mix of results. Nice! 

A set of colors I enjoy and was considering using in a landscape painting.

The three above images are something I stumbled upon and decided I would like to save, with the idea of studying them for use in making a digital painting later. The painting is supposed to be of a woman, but I could not find a woman with her head at the correct angle and that's what I needed help with. 

Just a truth! 

A screenshot of my desktop that I think is beautiful and explanatory.

AHS 12 28 23

 Thingss I made today on My Paint and Luna Pic, using a graphic tablet. It's going to be a little hard for me to get used to the graphic tablet. Or, whatever it is actually called. 

The top one is the original. The other two were fiddled about on Luna Pic. The main point was to learn to use the tablet. I kind of like them, though.

Landscape painting ala My Paint and Luna Pic

 All of these were made by me in December of 2023, mostly on the 13th, if I remember correctly. One of them is signed and uploaded to FB as proof. 

I do not mind anyone using any of these for inspiraton or even as the beginning of a new piece. So long as they give credit where credit is due and  preferably, let me know so I can see what they have done. Oh, and as long as it is so different that everyone can tell it is not the same piece! 

Rainbows and Triangles

 As a side note, because I wa reminded of this by talk of rainbow flags and triangles, I had a bit of an argument with a person who is a friend of the family, mostly spending time with oen of my sisters - this was years ago, now- because, she was wearing a purple triangle. Well, it wasn't because she was wearing it, which would have been a little weird unless she just loved a good triangle shaped piece of jewelry, but because she said it represented lesbian oppression under Hitler's reign of terror against the LBGTQ (etc).

1. There was no LBGTQ political party back then.
2. Hitler never targeted lesbians. That is he targeted a few people who happened to also be lesbians, but he did not target them for lesbianism. He targeted them for propaganda against his reign of terror, which was:
3. Not a reign of terror against JUST people who are now in the LGBTQ political party. It was against anyone who wasn't Aryan. The first peoples targeted were not homosexuals, for instance, but they were the disabled people, Jehovah's Witnesses and Jews. The ones that most people would agree are difficult and get some sort of special privilege. He also targeted people of other political parties, but they could switch instead of die, and he targeed kids who listen to Swing music even if they would otherwise make good Aryans, because, they were mixing negroids and caucasian values together. Hence why there is a movie called Swing Kids, that more people should watch.

But, mostly:
4. The purple triangle is the sign of Jehovah's Witnesses oppression under Hitler's reign of terror. And :

5. It is really extremely gross not only to take something that represents someone else and use it for your own agenda, but :

6. It is actually part of your own reign of terror when you use that symbol to try to obliterate the meaning of another people by actually using what symbolizes them to symbolize something that is not only not part of their lifestyle, but not having it as any part of their lifestyle is an integral part of their lifestyle.

Which, in a different way goes for the rainbow, too.

The Rainbow Coalition, which I have heard LGBTQ members claim is about their movement, was about promoting race relations in a positive manner.

Also, Jssephine Baker had her "rainbow family" which was, if I remember correctly, the inspiration for the the Rainbow Coalition, where Josephine Baker purposely adopted children of different races for the sake of raising different races of children together in harmony. The LGBTQ has spoken of themselves as "family", "family under ther rainbow" and "the rainbow family" But they are not.

The orginal rainbow family was the ENTIRE EARTH, because, that promise was to everyone. You could say it was most especially for Noah's bloodline, though. However, that is also everyone on the planet right now.

Josephine Baker was in some way honoring the intention of the maker of the rainbow and mankind. So was the Rainbow Coalition.

The end.

(I posted this as a comment under a video on YouTube. Then, on Facebook.  I am posting it here, in case it gets erased there. )